NOT - TWO Nietzsche and “die ewige Wiederkunft des Gleichen”
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국동서정신과학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국동서정신과학회지 / 7권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Michael Skowron
ㆍ저자명 : Michael Skowron
목차
DigitThunder and Silence or Vimalakirti and Nietzsche
Body-Language
Eternal Past and Eternal Future
Wiederkehr and Wiederkunft
The Same and not the Same
Genitivus Subjectivus and Objectivus
Conclusion
ENDNOTES
한국어 초록
otion of "Not-Two" is well known from the Indian Vedanta philosophy and in Buddhism but it is less known in Western philosophy. After an introduction to the philosophy of Not-Two through the "digital age" and the Vimalakirti-Sutra, this paper shows how this notion can also be found in Nietzsche and develops it by examining Nietzsches famous formula "die ewige Wiederkunft des Gleichen". It is shown that each part of this formula has a more or less obvious double meaning, for which the small but significant difference between Wiederkunft and Wiederkehr is the best example, so that in the end we get almost two formulas, which are nevertheless neither one nor two. The methodological guide-line of this examination is not only language but also the body as the necessary physical context to understand this formula. The paper also discusses the translation of the formula into English and Korean, suggesting that basic philosophical concepts like these can not really be translated.Key words : Not-Two, Nietzsche, Vimalakirti, Zarathustra, Eternal Recurrence and Coming Again of the Same
영어 초록
otion of "Not-Two" is well known from the Indian Vedanta philosophy and in Buddhism but it is less known in Western philosophy. After an introduction to the philosophy of Not-Two through the "digital age" and the Vimalakirti-Sutra, this paper shows how this notion can also be found in Nietzsche and develops it by examining Nietzsches famous formula "die ewige Wiederkunft des Gleichen". It is shown that each part of this formula has a more or less obvious double meaning, for which the small but significant difference between Wiederkunft and Wiederkehr is the best example, so that in the end we get almost two formulas, which are nevertheless neither one nor two. The methodological guide-line of this examination is not only language but also the body as the necessary physical context to understand this formula. The paper also discusses the translation of the formula into English and Korean, suggesting that basic philosophical concepts like these can not really be translated. Key words : Not-Two, Nietzsche, Vimalakirti, Zarathustra, Eternal Recurrence and Coming Again of the Same참고 자료
없음"한국동서정신과학회지"의 다른 논문
- 정신역동적 집단심리치료 장면에서의 상담자의 치료적 반응에 대한 연구12페이지
- 學校의 性敎育에 관한 硏究動向 11페이지
- 불경 번역에 있어서 주요 용어의 음역에 관한 고찰16페이지
- 집단미술치료에 따른 유아 공격성의 질적 변화 연구22페이지
- 주의력결핍과잉행동장애와 물질남용16페이지
- 상담경력수준에 따른 개인상담 슈퍼비전 교육내용 요구, 실제 및 만족도 분석19페이지
- 고등학생을 위한 대인관계능력 증진 집단상담 프로그램의 개발 및 효과13페이지
- 바가바드가타와 인간이 추구해야 할 의식13페이지
- 샹키야 철학과 바가바드기따의 구나(Guna)에 관한 비교연구18페이지
- 청각장애학생의 통합교육에 대한 태도연구12페이지