禮와 비지배의 자유에 관한 일고찰

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 서강대학교 철학연구소 ㆍ수록지정보 : 철학논집
ㆍ저자명 : 고은강

목차

I. 들어가는 말
II. 禮에서 비지배의 의미
III. 曲禮: 개인 간 일상의 禮
IV. 儀禮: 주요 의식의 행동 지침으로서 禮
V. 맺는 말: 禮에서 견제적 민주주의의 가능성

한국어 초록

본 연구는 ⌈예기(禮記)⌉, ⌈의례(儀禮)⌉를 중심으로, ‘禮가 어떻게 개인에게 비지배로서의 자유를 보장하며, 이를 통해 평등을 도모하는가’를 살펴보고자 한다. 논의의 전개는 다음과 같다. 페팃(Philip Pettit)이 제시한 ‘비지배(non-domination)’의 개념을 禮에 대입하여 이해한다. 이를 ⌈예기⌉와 ⌈의례⌉에 적용한다. ⌈예기⌉에서는 ⌈곡례(曲禮)⌉ 편에 초점을 맞추어, 일상에서 禮의 실천에 나타난 비지배를 설명한다. 결론적으로, lceil;예기⌉?⌈곡례⌉ 편에서 발견되는 비지배의 양상은 ‘다른 사람에게 지배를 행사하려는 자신의 능력에 대한 통제’로 요약될 수 있다. ⌈의례⌉?에서는 주요 의식의 행동 지침에 나타난 ‘비지배’를 辭 개념에 초점을 맞추어 설명한다.

영어 초록

This article examines Liji and Yili with a special focus on Philip Pettit’s
‘non-domination’. Pettit redefines freedom as non-domination rather than
non-interference. Human beings cannot live alone. They live in community. In
community, non-interference is not the solution for individual freedom. For
freedom, individuals should be in the state of not being dominated by anyone.
Individuals hold each other not only in mutual dependance but also in check.
Li or propriety aims at the social system, in which non-domination is
guaranteed in any human relationship. Li supports social order based on age,
class, gender, and race. However, the difference of age, class, gender, and race
confirmed by li does not aim at creating dominance-subordination between
individuals. It rather aims at equality derived from power balance. The way of
behavior according to li is based on ‘respect’. ‘Respect’ is self-control not to
dominate others. It also functions as an ideological method to check others’
dominance.
Quli, the first chapters of Liji is analyzed with a focus on non-domination in
face-to-face relationship between individuals in everyday life. Li in everyday life
guides individuals to the behavior not dominating others. If an individual
violate li, it often means that he intends to dominate others. Yili illustrates how
to keep mutual respect between power groups. The behavior for mutual respect
is significant to guarantee non-domination between power groups. If a king
misbehaves in a diplomatic event, it is interpreted as an attempt to dominate
other countries. If he violate li in a national ceremony, it may be understood
as a sign of dominating his subjects and it may be led to his resignation.

참고 자료

없음