韓國漢文文法的形態論敎育論硏究

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국한자한문교육학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국한자한문교육학회 국제학술대회자료집
ㆍ저자명 : 安載澈

영어 초록

This thesis suggests the research direction of educating morphology of Classical Chinese Grammar in Korea. This thesis mainly focuses on two things. First, developing Korean’s interpretation ability to the original text through the knowledge about morphology of Classical Chinese Grammar. Second, studying the way instructors teach Classical Chinese in morphological methods. In other words, we will look through the objects, contents, instructing methods and evaluation method of educating morphology. 1. The objects of educating morphology 1.1 Know the concept and type of morpheme. 1.2 Know the function and structure of morpheme. 1.3 Know the combination relationship of morpheme. 1.4 Know the concept and classification of a part of speech. 1.5 Know the principle of words formation. 1.6 Know the function of an expletive. 2. The contents of educating morphology 2.1 Theory of a part of speech 2.1.1 ‘A part of speech’ is the group of words with similar characteristics classified according to functions and meanings. Generally, words are classified by grammatical features. Grammatical features includes forms, meanings and functions. A group of words that are sorted by these features is called ‘A part of speech’, and the research about these groups of words is called ‘Theory of a part of speech’. 2.1.2 Words are grouped in ten parts in Korean school. Ten parts of speech are sorted to a substantive and an expletive. A substantive contains a noun, a pronoun, a numeral, a verb, an adjective and an adverb. An expletive includes a preposition, a conjunction, a particle and an exclamation. 2.2 Principle of words formation 2.2.1 Characteristics of ‘Classical Chinese words’ : ‘Classical Chinese vocabulary’ consists of ‘characters’, ‘words’, and ‘idioms’ in the respect of system of Classical Chinese. ‘Classical Chinese words’ are one part of ‘Classical Chinese vocabulary’ and make grammatical structure that contains the functions of words, phrases and sentences. In the system of Classical Chinese, ‘Classical Chinese characters’ are clearly different from ‘Classical Chinese words’. ‘Classical Chinese characters’ cannot make grammatical structures, but ‘Classical Chinese words’ make syntax structure of sentences. It is proper to say that ‘Classical Chinese words’ are di‐ or trisyllabic words in the system of Classical Chinese. 2.2.2 Classification of ‘Classical Chinese words’ : This study mainly focuses on ‘Written language’ before modern ages, and ‘newly made words’ after modern ages. 2.2.3 Classification of words by formation methods : In general, words are sorted to ‘Simplex’ and ‘Compound’. ‘Simplex’ consists of monosyllabic simplex and multisyllabic simplex. ‘Compound’ consists of compound, which is classified to an analogous term, a relative term and structural term, and derivative, which is classified to ‘root+affix’ structure and ‘affix+root’ structure. 3. Instructing method of morphology 3.1 When educating the organization of words, ‘Coined‐word‐segmentalization method’ is effective, and when educating the sort of words, ‘Language‐application method’, ‘Search‐out method’, and ‘Comparative‐learning method’ are effective. 3.2 ‘Instructing method through analyzing meanings of characters’ and ‘Instructing method through analyzing meanings of words’ are helpful to educating characters of Classical Chinese and words of Classical Chinese, respectively. 3.3 When educating multisyllabic vocabulary, ‘discussion, play‐a‐role method’, ‘comprehending‐through‐tales method’, ‘comprehending‐transformative‐use‐of‐vocabulary method’, ‘comprehending‐characteristics‐of‐onomatopoeic‐and‐mimesis method’ are effective to teaching idioms, compressive words, argot, and adjective words, respectively. 4. Evaluation method of instructing morphology Evaluation of instructing morphology about Classical Chinese should be done as an extension of ‘teaching and learning morphology’ Instructing morphology about Classical Chinese can be evaluated by following questions. “Can learners find, by on their own, grammatical functions, meanings and combination principles of morphemes through real materials?” And we can evaluate learners abilities of observation, judgement, analysis and synthesis in that process. In Korea, achievement levels and standards are developed, which are based on current curriculum of Classical Chinese subject in middle∙high school. So we studied evaluation method of instructing morphology by these criteria.

참고 자료

없음