왕릉건축을 통해 본 박자청(朴子靑)의 김사행(金師幸)건축 계승

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국건축역사학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 건축역사연구 / 27권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : 김버들, 조정식

목차

Abstract
1. 서 론
2. 문헌기록을 통해 본 려말선초 문묘건축
2-1. 조선 태조대 김사행의 문묘
2-2. 태종대 박자청의 문묘
3. 김사행의 왕릉공역
3-1. 정·현릉 이전의 고려왕릉
3-2. 정현릉과 영전(고려 공민왕과 노국대장공주)
3-3. 정릉과 흥천사
4. 박자청의 왕릉건축
4-1. 제릉(齊陵)과 연경사(衍慶寺)
4-2. 건원릉(健元陵)과 개경사(開慶寺)
4-3. 후릉(厚陵)과 흥교사(興敎寺)
4-4. 헌릉(獻陵)
5. 박자청이 계승한 김사행의 왕릉건축
6. 결론
참고문헌

영어 초록

This study investigates the relationship of two architectures ‘Kim Sa-haeng’ and ‘Park Ja-cheong.’ They were the architects whose architecture were established and well known however they were not acknowledged by the people. Because they were not revealed under the large-scale national construction in complicated circumstances at home and abroad. The results were as follows; First, Kim Sa-haeng who was an overseas architect in Yuan dynasty stood out in all areas of architecture. Particularly in making royal tombs; His works were recognized as the most beautiful royal tombs ever existed and was later on followed by the Joseon dynasty. Second, Park completed the construction of Joseon's by faithfully reflecting on the discussed process of Neo-Confucian while coming after the time of the construction of Kim Sa-haeng. Third, although Kim Sa-haeng was a vassal of the Buddhist nation in Goryeo, he built the Moon-myo, a Confucian inspired temple of Joseon. Park Ja-cheong, who continued to build Kim Sa-haeng's architecture, reproduced Kim Sa-haeng's confucian's temple of Joseon dynasty while modifying it according to the situation in Joseon dynasty. The constructions of the two architects' monuments continues unabatedly. Their architecture has continued without massive changes.

참고 자료

없음