* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교정학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 矯正硏究 / 21권
ㆍ저자명 : 金鎭赫
ㆍ저자명 : 金鎭赫
목차
死刑制度에 관한 硏究Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 死刑制度 槪觀
Ⅲ. 死刑存廢論
Ⅳ. 死刑制度의 必要性 및 改善方案
Ⅴ. 結論
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
영어 초록
The death penalty is one of the oldest forms of punishment, and despite its evil nature it still remains a worthy system. Ultimately, of course, the capital punishment is stepping towards extinction. Also, many countries are banning it altogether, if not already banned. However, it is rather inappropriate to say that a country that prohibits execution is a country that assures humans rights. Similarly, a person against the death penalty does not necessarily mean that he/she is a human rights activist. So far, the debate whether to continue or to abolish the capital punishment has been valued too abstractly by ethical and religious measures. It is true that the death penalty has realistic functions such as acting as the last measures to social protection, realizing judicial definition, and reducing criminal judicial cost, however, they have not been valued properly. Thus, these functions must be considered before a decision can be made whether to use the death penalty or to eliminate it from the society. The capital punishment has been used as means to control the society, the East and the West alike, from the ancient times and has undergone many changes historically. One of the main problems of the system, however, is the fact that it has been used as a political tool. Therefore, the death penalty has to be prevented altogether from being used as an instrument to rid of political opponents or to suppress minor powers or alienated groups. In addition, the system has to be strengthened by devising plans to minimize the room for error. Criminal law that allows death penalty to political offenders or public safely violators should be revised. Meanwhile, trial procedures, such as trials by jury, also need changes so that the highest level of prudence is given for the capital punishment. The capital punishment is a fearful system where human lives are take away but is also absolutely necessary. It is an appropriate retribution for those immoral members of the society who has no respect for the life of others. It also is a defense mechanism to prevent more lives from being harmed. Therefore, we must change our attitude about the death penalty to a more realistic viewpoint. In general, those criminal procedures that only protect the criminals rights should also be revised to protect the victims instead. In sum, the capital punishment will no longer be needed when the criminals that deserve the ultimate punishment no longer exist in our society.참고 자료
없음이 자료와 함께 구매한 자료
- 사형제도 폐지 8페이지
- 사형제도에 대한 새로운 視角 24페이지
"矯正硏究"의 다른 논문
- 교정참여인사의 활동실태와 개선방안19페이지
- 사회봉사명령제도의 제문제점35페이지
- 한국 교정․보호 조직의 발전방향23페이지
- 수형자 직업교육훈련의 개선방안에 관한 연구26페이지
- 韓國 地域社會 矯正 戰略과 向後 課題 - 地域社會의 感覺 假說을 中心으로 -29페이지
- 범죄자 처우모델의 결합론적 모색28페이지
- 藥物中毒再㓉을 위한 프로그램이 마약관련 在所者들에게 미치는 영향에 대한 연구31페이지
- 가석방제도의 개선방안39페이지
- 행형의 목적과 수용자 인권36페이지
- 세계교정이념의 흐름과 한국교정 -포스트모더니즘 범죄학이론을 중심으로-39페이지