Cross-verified Measurement of Sulfide Concentration in Anaerobic Conditions Using Spectroscopic, Electrochemical, and Mass Spectrometric Methods
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국방사성폐기물학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 방사성폐기물학회지 / 21권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Nakkyu Chae, Samuel Park, Sungyeol Choi
ㆍ저자명 : Nakkyu Chae, Samuel Park, Sungyeol Choi
목차
1. Introduction2. Methods of Measuring Sulfide Ions
2.1 Methylene Blue Method
2.2 Sulfide Ion-Selective Electrode
2.3 Comparing the Methylene Blue and ISEMethods
3. Methods
3.1 Materials
3.2 Analytical Instruments
3.3 First Study: Sulfide and SAOB
3.4 Second Study: Sulfide Without SAOB
3.5 Third Study: Methylene Blue Method
3.6 Fourth Study: Comparison of ISE andMethylene Blue Method
4. Results and Discussion
4.1 First Study: Field-applicable TitrationMethod (with SAOB)
4.2 Second Study: Laboratory Titration Method(Without SAOB)
4.3 Third Study: Methylene Blue Method
4.4 Fourth Study: Sulfide ISE and MethyleneBlue Comparison
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
REFERENCES
영어 초록
Sulfide concentrations critically affect worker safety and the integrities of underground facilities, such as deep geological repositories for spent nuclear fuel. Sulfide is highly sensitive to oxygen, which can oxidize sulfide to sulfate. This can hinder precise measurement of the sulfide concentration. Hence, a literature review was conducted, which revealed that two methods are commonly used: the methylene blue and sulfide ion-selective electrode (ISE) methods. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) was used for comparison with the two methods. The sulfide ISE method was found to be superior as it yielded results with a higher degree of accuracy and involved fewer procedures for quantification of the sulfide concentration in solution. ICP-OES results can be distorted significantly when sulfide is present in solution owing to the formation of H2S gas in the ICP-OES nebulizer. Therefore, the ICP-OES must be used with caution when quantifying underground water to prevent any distortion in the measured results. The results also suggest important measures to avoid problems when using ICP-OES for site selection. Furthermore, the sulfide ISE method is useful in determining sulfide concentrations in the field to predict the lifetime of disposal canisters of spent nuclear fuel in deep geological repositories and other industries.참고 자료
없음태그
"방사성폐기물학회지"의 다른 논문
- Improvement on Coupling Technique Between COMSOL and PH..8페이지
- Comparison of Numerical Analysis Methods of APro for th..9페이지
- Development of Biosphere Assessment Modeling Strategy f..16페이지
- Protective Coatings for Accident Tolerant Fuel Cladding..33페이지
- Radiation Distribution Around Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear..20페이지
- A Current Status of Natural Analogues Programs in Natio..29페이지
- Phase Behavior of the Ternary NaCl-PuCl3-Pu Molten Salt10페이지
- Effect of Rock Mass Properties on Coupled Thermo-Hydro-..19페이지
- Molten Salt-Based Carbon-Neutral Critical Metal Smeltin..14페이지
- Design of Copper Alloys Preventing Grain Boundary Preci..8페이지