교육시설 안전 등급 인증과 학교 안전도 심사에 대한 연구

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 대한안전경영과학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 대한안전경영과학회지 / 25권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : 김명관, 권영국

목차

Abstract
1. 서 론
1.1 연구의 필요성
1.2 연구 목적
2. 교육시설 안전 인증 선행 연구
2.1 교육부 교육부 안전성 평가 인증제도
2.2 학교 안전사고 발생통계
2.3 교사들의 안전사고 체험수기 분석
2.4 미국 버몬트주 학교 안전성 평가 CheckList 사례 고찰
2.5 인도네시아 학교 안전성 연구 사례 고찰
2.6 중국 초등 및 중등 학교(PSS)의 안전위험 중요도 분석 사례 고찰
3. 연구방법
3.1 연구 대상 선별 및 인구통계학적 특성
3.2 연구 모형 및 변수
4. 연구의 결과분석 및 고찰
4.1 실내환경안전 제 1계층 AHP분석 결과
4.2 제 2계층 AHP분석 결과
4.3 전문가 설문 : 종합 중요도 순위 분석 결과
4.4 일반인 설문조사
5. 결론
5.1 연구결과 요약
5.2 결론 및 제언
5.3 토론 및 미래 연구
6. References

영어 초록

This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation items and weight determination of the indoor environmental safety area, which has the most frequent accidents, among the safety certification evaluations of educational facilities by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, which has been conducted since May 2021. As a preceding study, the evaluation items of the school safety evaluation checklist being implemented in the US state of Vermont were compared, and the causes of accidents judged by teachers in the accident experiences written by 200 Korean teachers were compared with the safety certification evaluation items belonged to the Ministry of Education. In addition, research literature using the AHP analysis technique on safety risks of elementary and secondary schools in China and safety evaluation index study cases of 539 elementary school children in Indonesia were analyzed. Through these preceding studies, measures to add and adjust evaluation items were derived and the validity and importance rankings of evaluation items were calculated through AHP questionnaires to teachers and safety experts. In addition, a survey was conducted on 104 ordinary people to verify the results of expert analysis. As a result of expert AHP analysis, 'safety education and disaster response training (.396)' was the highest priority for the relative importance of the first layer, followed by 'safety measures (.387)' and 'building materials'. Safety (.216)' was found to be the highest priority. In the overall importance ranking of the 13 second-tier screening items, safety accident prevention education had the highest priority and disaster preparedness training ranked second, proving that the Ministry of Education's review weight was underestimated. In addition, slip and collision accident countermeasures, which were not in the existing Ministry of Education review items, ranked 4th, laboratory practice room safety measures ranked 6th, and sanitation, cleanliness, hazardous substance management, and cafeteria/cooking room safety measures ranked 9th, indicating a significant level of importance. Referring to the importance ranking, which is the result of this study, it is suggested that it is necessary to review the weight of each review item again.

참고 자료

없음