입상 활성탄 표면 개질을 통한 과불화옥탄산 (PFOA) 제거 향상 및 특성 평가
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.09.25
- 최종 저작일
- 2023.08
- 10페이지/
어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,000원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 대한상하수도학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 상하수도학회지 / 37권 / 4호
ㆍ저자명 : 신정우, 안병렬
목차
1. 서 론
2. 실험 재료 및 방법
2.1 활성탄 표면 개질
2.2 PFOA 제거효율 실험
2.3 등온흡착 실험
2.4 반응속도 실험
2.5 분석 방법
3. 결과 및 고찰
3.1 표면 개질에 의한 표면 형상 및 세공구조와 비표면적 변화
3.2 PFOA 제거효율 비교
3.3 pH에 따른 PFOA 흡착능 비교 실험
3.4 등온흡착 실험
3.5 반응속도 실험
4. 결 론
사 사
영어 초록
Perfluorooctanoic acid(PFOA) was one of widely used per- and poly substances(PFAS) in the industrial field and its concentration in the surface and groundwater was found with relatively high concentration compared to other PFAS. Since various processes have been introduced to remove the PFOA, adsorption using GAC is well known as a useful and effective process in water and wastewater treatment. Surface modification for GAC was carried out using Cu and Fe to enhance the adsorption capacity and four different adsorbents, such as GAC-Cu, GAC-Fe, GAC-Cu(OH)2, GAC-Fe(OH)3 were prepared and compared with GAC. According to SEM-EDS, the increase of Cu or Fe was confirmed after surface modification and higher weight was observed for Cu and Fe hydroxide(GAC-Cu(OH)2 and GAC-Fe(OH)3, respectively). BET analysis showed that the surface modification reduced specific surface area and total pore volumes. The highest removal efficiency(71.4%) was obtained in GAC-Cu which is improved by 17.9% whereas the use of Fe showed lower removal efficiency compared to GAC. PFOA removal was decreased with increase of solution pH indicating electrostatic interaction governs at low pH and its effect was decreased when the point of zero charges(pzc) was negatively increased with an increase of pH. The enhanced removal of PFOA was clearly observed in solution pH 7, confirming the Cu in the surface of GAC plays a role on the PFOA adsorption. The maximum uptake was calculated as 257 and 345 μg/g for GAC and GAC-Cu using Langmuir isotherm. 40% and 80% of removal were accomplished within 1 h and 48 h. According to R2, only the linear pseudo-second-order(pso) kinetic model showed 0.98 whereas the others obtained less than 0.870.
참고 자료
없음
