논문 Kuptniratsatsaikul 2018을 risk of bias로 분석한 것입니다. <A+자료>

목차

없음

본문내용

Table 2: Sources of risk of bias (please make notes to justify your response for each item)

A
Was the method of randomization adequate?
YES
Enrolled patients were randomly allocated to the study group (40 patients) or the control group (40 patients) using randomization software.
어떤 프로그램인지 나와있지 않음

B
Was the treatment allocation concealed?
YES
Group assignments were sealed in opaque envelopes.
봉투에 넘버링에 대한 정보가 없음

C
Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented during the study?
1. Was the patient blinded to the intervention?
UNSURE
Except for research assistants who play the sole role in supervising the patient registration process, all researchers are blind to group tasks, but no exact rationale was found in the paper.
치료특성상 블라인딩이 불가
2. Was the care provider blinded to the intervention?
UNSURE
Except for research assistants who play the sole role in supervising the patient

참고 자료

없음